Safe spaces for working women: Mortimer Street in late Victorian and Edwardian times
October 2025
Photo: Fitzrovia News
If there is one thoroughfare in Fitzrovia which invites us to celebrate women’s history, then it must surely be Mortimer Street. It may seem unremarkable today, but in the early years of the twentieth century we might have seen far more women than men on its pavements. For this we can thank a social transformation which began over two hundred years ago.
Women have always worked, of course. But in Victorian and Edwardian Britain the emergence of new technologies and the rise of consumerism meant that more and more women were finding employment outside the home. Though domestic service remained an important source of income for many working-class women, they were now taking jobs in shops, mills and factories as well. Towards the end of the nineteenth century the invention of the typewriter and the telephone led to a steady growth in office work, and as a result more young women from the middle classes were also joining the workforce.
These developments had a noticeable impact in Fitzrovia. Here, the expansion of the Middlesex Hospital, the arrival of the clothing trade, and the proximity of West End shops and businesses would have brought women workers from a wide range of backgrounds into the area. As in other inner-city locations, this produced a pressing need for adequate housing. Hostels and lodging-houses designed specifically for women were one of the responses to this problem.
HOMES FOR WOMEN
Some of these new homes were created by private companies, others by charitable organisations such as the Young Women’s Christian Association (YWCA) and the Girls’ Friendly Society. Bodily comfort was by no means the only consideration. For many campaigners the moral welfare of young women workers was a primary concern, while others focused more on their safety. We should probably hesitate before condemning the efforts of some of these Victorian do-gooders to steer working girls away from “temptation”. Their approach can easily be dismissed today as controlling and puritanical, but it also had the effect of helping to protect women from violence and sexual exploitation by men.
On Mortimer Street some of the earliest women-only housing was provided by the All Saints Sisters of the Poor, an Anglican order of nuns attached to the church in Margaret Street. The Sisterhood had been founded in 1851 when Harriet Byron, a worshipper at All Saints, rented a house at 59 Mortimer Street and opened a home for widows and orphans. She was joined by a handful of other women who trained as nurses and dedicated their lives “to Christ and the service of the poor”. In 1856 the nuns moved with the widows and orphans to Margaret Street, and 59 Mortimer Street became St. Elizabeth’s Home, devoted to the care of incurable women rejected by London hospitals. By 1895 this had expanded into numbers 57 and 61, and had been rebuilt. Meanwhile in the 1880s the Sisters had established St. Gabriel’s Home for Anglican Shopgirls at 34 Mortimer Street, with a view to rescuing women from the “mixed company” permitted in other hostels. After taking over additional space in number 36, St. Gabriel’s was able to offer 21 beds with screens, a sitting-room, and a room for private prayer.
The building which once housed the YWCA hostel on the corner of Mortimer Street and Great Titchfield Street. Photo: Fitzrovia News.
The YWCA’s activities in Fitzrovia can be traced back to 1857, when a women’s hostel was opened on Upper Charlotte Street. In 1884 the Welbeck Home was created at 101 Mortimer Street, with beds for 60 young women and a restaurant attached. Demand for this accommodation was high, and in 1903-4 the YWCA embarked on its first major construction project in London, a purpose-built hostel at 42-44 Mortimer Street. Now a listed building and converted into private flats, Ames House still stands on the north-west corner with Great Titchfield Street — a handsome brick structure with subtle detailing and elegant chimneys above the gables. It was designed by the versatile architect Beresford Pite, and made possible by a donation from Alfred Ames, a member of a Unitarian family which had once been among the “merchant princes” of Bristol. At the end of the day, sad to say, the hostel was paid for in part out of a fortune which had originated in the eighteenth century slave-trade.
The new hostel housed 97 women in small bedrooms and cubicles, each with its own window and electric light. Its facilities were a model of comfort in their day, and included washrooms, a dining-room, a parlour-cum-library, and a workroom with heated irons. The 1911 census reveals that its residents had an average age of 25, and were quite diverse in their occupations: among them there were waitresses, typists, teachers, an assistant draper at Bourne and Hollingsworth, and a dressmaking assistant at Peter Robinson. Some had been born in London, but the majority came from outside the city — from Aberdeen, Newcastle, Halifax, Manchester, Wolverhampton, North Wales, Southampton, Devon and Cornwall, and many other locations. On the building’s ground floor there were four shops and a restaurant, the Welbeck, which helped to finance the running of the hostel.
WHERE TO EAT
Unlike the dining-room inside Ames House, the Welbeck Restaurant below it was open to non-resident women, serving them “good cheap food” in safe surroundings. An earlier women-only eating establishment had opened in 1888 at 81 Mortimer Street. This was the first of several Dorothy Restaurants, for “those who detest to have men about the place”. They were run by the Ladies’ Restaurant Association, founded by Isabel Cooper-Oakley, a Cambridge-educated feminist and theosophist who was also the proprietor of a millinery business on Wigmore Street.
Site of the first Dorothy Restaurant at 81 Mortimer Street. Photo: Fitzrovia News.
Between 12 and 3pm the Dorothy served dinners “consisting of a choice of two joints, bread, and two vegetables”, all for a fixed price of eight pence. The place had cream-coloured walls with “aesthetic crimson dados” and was “made gay with Japanese fans and umbrellas”. A few months later a Dorothy with even more splendid decor opened at 448 Oxford Street, close to Orchard Street. In 1890 the Central National Society for Women’s Suffrage held one of its meetings in the Mortimer Street branch.
Another venue where women were able to speak their minds was the Somerville Club at 21 Mortimer Street. This had been established in 1881 to provide a meeting place for women interested in social and political issues, and is regarded as the first proper women’s club. In 1883 it moved to Oxford Street. While women on quite modest incomes could have afforded a meal at the Dorothy, the Club would have catered for a more middle class clientele.
WOMEN IN BUSINESS
Women dressmakers and milliners had been running businesses on Mortimer Street since at least the 1840s. More enterprises were to follow. Notable among them was a cookery school opened in 1883 by Agnes Marshall and her husband, who took over a building at number 30 that had once housed The National Training School for cooks. The Marshall School of Cookery was immensely successful, and is said to have trained 10,000 cooks a year. After expanding into number 32, the couple opened a domestic employment agency and a shop selling household utensils and supplies — such as flavourings, spices, and syrups — under the Marshall label.
The glass “penny licks” were replaced by Agnes Marshall’s edible ice-cream cornet. Photo: Alison Askew.
Agnes Marshall herself was a celebrity cook who published several recipe books and travelled the country giving demonstrations. Her speciality was the frozen dessert, and she is credited with the invention of the edible ice-cream cornet. On street-vendors’ carts cornets eventually replaced glass dishes (“penny licks”) which had been dipped in water between customers and then reused. The pastry cone was obviously a more hygienic alternative.
27 Mortimer Street was the location of Hamilton & Co. Photo: Fitzrovia News.
Another business of note was Hamilton & Co, a women’s shirt- and dress-making co-operative based since the early 1880s at 27 Mortimer Street. Its displays included costumes promoted by the Rational Dress Society, an organisation which campaigned against the heavy and restrictive clothing then viewed as essential for women. Among the garments it endorsed were divided skirts, which made it easier for women to ride bicycles, and a light corset designed by female students at Girton and Newnham colleges. By 1888 Hamilton’s also had a depot at number 23, from which it launched The Rational Dress Society’s Gazette.
Through the exclusive spaces created for them during this period women were encouraged to enter a public realm which till then had been dominated by men. When I was growing up in the 1950s some of these spaces still existed. Trains, for example, had “Ladies Only” compartments, available on one line as late as 1977. Along with many others, I saw the disappearance of facilities like these as part of the progress towards gender equality. Now of course I support the calls for their reinstatement. Until women can access public spaces without fear of harassment and violence from men, I shall have to content myself with a vision of Mortimer Street in a bygone age. Its pavements are thronged with women on their way to work, or heading out for a nutritious eightpence dinner. Their lives are certainly not perfect, but here at least they can relax for a while. There is scarcely a man in sight. It’s a different world.
I’m grateful to Emily Gee of Historic England for her ground-breaking work on women’s housing. See: “Where shall she live?”: Housing the New Working Woman in Late Victorian and Edwardian London, in Living, Leisure and Law: Eight Building Types in England, 1800-1941, ed. Geoff Brandwood, Spire Books, 2010.
IN UNIFORM: STORIES OF NURSES AND THEIR CLOTHING
When visiting one of The Fitzrovia Chapel’s fascinating exhibitions, you are almost certain to bump into at least one former nurse. At its recent show about health workers’ uniforms, the nurses of course were out in force. In late November over thirty of them joined the same guided tour as I did, led by one of the curators, Freya Bently. Their contribution to the event was tremendous.
They were there because the Chapel was once part of the Middlesex Hospital. In 2008 the hospital was literally demolished around it, leaving it in isolated splendour while a new set of buildings (of questionable aesthetic and social value) was constructed on the site, incorporating what is now called Pearson Square. But we are grateful for small mercies. The Chapel is glorious, and over the years it has been transformed into an interesting arts venue.
The name of the Chapel’s new setting happily commemorates its original designer, John Loughborough Pearson, who created it in 1891-2. It was not until 1929 that work on the interior was completed, overseen by the architect’s son, Frank Loughborough Pearson. The elder Pearson was one of the brightest stars in the firmament of late Victorian Gothic Revival architecture. His son Frank, who was born and lived for a time in Marylebone, was no slouch either. He finished many of his late father’s projects, including Truro Cathedral; and designed a large number of structures himself, including the splendid Novello House on Wardour Street.
For Fitzrovians, former Middlesex Hospital Staff, and many casual visitors, the Chapel is the jewel in the crown of our local attractions. And erstwhile Middlesex and UCLH nurses did a lot more than just turn up at the exhibition: they actually helped to create it. Old uniforms were contributed, and conversations about how they were worn and received were set up by curators Bently and Jo Horton.
An excellent small catalogue which accompanied the exhibition supplies many gripping details. Here I will just outline what for me were some of the exhibition’s highlights.
“I devised this little train so that when you lean over a patient your ankles will be covered, and the students will not be able to see them”
This somewhat disingenuous remark is attributed to Godiva Marian Thorold, the Matron of the Middlesex from 1870 to 1896. Concern for the moral welfare of young working women was often displayed by the powers-that-be during the great upsurge in women’s extra-domestic employment in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This can come over as patronising and puritanical. But for me it demonstrates a proper regard for the safety of women who were leaving home to work in the public sector at a time when it was spatially and socially dominated by men. In the Middlesex Hospital, where bodily contact was an inevitable part of the job, it was particularly important.
The cover of the exhibition catalogue has a photo of Nellie Brewer, a nurse at the Middlesex from 1908 to 1911.
This photo shows, from left to right, the outfit worn by Matron Godiva Marian Thorold herself in 1891; and nurses’ uniforms from the First World War, 1914-1918, and from the 1950s. Nurses’ ankles and calves are being gradually uncovered, and are being accepted as less of a danger to all concerned than was previously believed — although it must be said that the popularity of sexual fantasies involving nurses may have been fuelled in part by the emergence of their legs into the light of day. (Other people have similar fantasies about firemen. It’s the uniforms that do it).
In 1948 the National Health Service was created, and with it came a new uniform, designed by none other than Norman Hartnell, the late Queen Elizabeth’s favourite couturier. It was produced in the first place for St John’s nurses working overseas, but was approved in 1948 by the General Nursing Council as the uniform for state registered nurses employed by the new NHS. It features a lavender-coloured poplin dress with a pinched-in waist and a full skirt, a pointed white collar, and elaborate frilly cuffs. The non-nurses on our tour thought it was lovely; but the nurses who’d actually worn it pointed out that the collars were stiff and chafed their necks; and the cuffs were just “ridiculous”.
One of the joys of the exhibition was that visitors were given the opportunity to handle and even to try on some of the items which had been lent by former nurses. This 1980s dress worn in the Royal London Hospital, a practical adaptation of the original Norman Hartnell design, proved a great hit with everybody. Sadly I didn’t have time to go into the changing room with it and discover whether nursing had all along been my true vocation.
My own sartorial interests tend to focus on shoes, so I was a bit disappointed that none of these were included in the exhibition (perhaps because unlike the dresses nurses carried on wearing them after leaving the hospital, and so they wore out). But the nurses in our group reported that black or brown lace-ups were prescribed, depending on whether you were qualified or still studying. Nowadays, they told me, nurses are allowed to wear trainers provided they have laces and cover the whole of the foot. One woman had heard a story about a trainee nurse being sent home when she turned up for work in Doc Martens, despite — as we agreed — these being eminently practical. Perhaps, as was the case with school uniforms in the 1960s, the moment an item of clothing became fashionable, they banned it. Nurses’ stockings were generally beige. Later, when I tried to check online whether nurses had ever been permitted to wear black stockings, I was immediately bombarded with soft porn, so I still don’t know the answer.
I’m not a uniform person, but it’s a rather nice uniform, and it’s a uniform that I always felt very proud wearing
— Debra Kroll, Covid Story, personal unpublished account.
Nan West and the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital
A visit in December 2023
GATHERING WINTER FUEL (MY TITLE). From ‘December’, to the left of the door
IN 1927 at the age of 23 the painter Nan West received an enviable but daunting commission. She was given the task of decorating 90 square metres of wall space in the new waiting hall at the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital’s outpatients department on Bolsover Street, Fitzrovia. The Hospital had grown out of ‘The Society for the Treatment, at their own homes, of Poor Persons afflicted with Diseases and Distortions of the Spine, Chest, and Hip, etc.’, established in 1836 through the efforts of Dr. Charles Verral and Mrs. Henry Ogle of Eastbourne. In 1908 the outpatients department had acquired a new building on Bolsover Street, and in 1927 this was extended. The walls of the vast room where patients waited to consult a doctor would have been bleak indeed if West, the daughter of the hospital chairman, had not been called in to enliven them.
The old Orthopaedic Hospital on Bolsover Street, 2010
Nan West was born in London in 1904. By her own account her childhood was miserable, but things improved when she started attending the Slade School of Art in Bloomsbury. There she was a contemporary of Rex Whistler, and in 1927 she was working as Whistler’s assistant on another set of murals which the pair was producing for the restaurant at the Tate Gallery. West began the hospital murals around the same time.

The Waiting Hall
Most of the murals represent the months of the year, and were originally displayed above the twelve doors leading to the clinics and offices. Painted in oils on canvas, each of the months has a garland of seasonal flowers enclosing its name. The paintings must surely have made life for its suffering occupants just a little brighter. In the early 20th century art was being created not just for prosperous drawing rooms, but also for the public spaces used by the poor and the not-so-rich.
At the far end of the Waiting Hall the largest mural, about 4 metres by 3, depicts Summer. Four people are picnicking under a striped umbrella, while two lovers lie under a cherry tree, and another couple wanders off into the countryside, where Dover Castle can be seen on a distant hill.
After her marriage, West suffered a mental breakdown, which caused her to give up painting. In her unpublished autobiography she writes, ‘Everything ceased to be interesting, and I knew I was losing the skill I had at drawing….’. In 1956 she committed suicide.
The Waiting Hall is listed (Grade II), and when a new outpatients department was built for the hospital further down the street in 2009, the old hall was incorporated into an office building created on the original site at 50 Bolsover Street.
West believed the hospital project had been too demanding for her ‘little talent’. Happily, we can judge for ourselves whether or not this was simply a case of ‘imposter syndrome’ – that is, West was underestimating her own abilities.
I suspect that you will want to disagree with West. Her paintings are quite lovely. To quote Historic England on its listing page: ‘This is one of the largest mural cycles of the time to survive in London… The austere classicism of the architecture provides an elegant framework for Nan West’s informal painted scheme; the whole being an elegant and well-conceived composition. The murals have great rarity within a type which was never numerous and especially vulnerable to change. They also are an important example of a tradition of female mural artists working in the inter-war years whose work is highly regarded ..’
The listing entry notes that West’s career flourished until 1937, and during this time she painted a Noah’s Ark scene at the Child Welfare Clinic in Chelsea, and murals for Simpson’s Tea Rooms in Piccadilly. Sadly, these no longer survive. She also wrote and illustrated ‘The Landscape Painter’s Calendar’. which was published by Methuen in 1928.
To see the National Orthopaedic Hospital Murals, contact Concord London Developments, The Listed Hall, 50 Bolsover Street, London W1W 5NG. Tel. +44 20 7307 1820.